Commit a7179b89 authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

rculist: list_first_or_null_rcu() should use list_entry_rcu()

commit c34ac00caefbe49d40058ae7200bd58725cebb45 upstream.

list_first_or_null() should test whether the list is empty and return
pointer to the first entry if not in a RCU safe manner.  It's broken
in several ways.

* It compares __kernel @__ptr with __rcu @__next triggering the
  following sparse warning.

  net/core/dev.c:4331:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces)

* It doesn't perform rcu_dereference*() and computes the entry address
  using container_of() directly from the __rcu pointer which is
  inconsitent with other rculist interface.  As a result, all three
  in-kernel users - net/core/dev.c, macvlan, cgroup - are buggy.  They
  dereference the pointer w/o going through read barrier.

* While ->next dereference passes through list_next_rcu(), the
  compiler is still free to fetch ->next more than once and thus
  nullify the "__ptr != __next" condition check.

Fix it by making list_first_or_null_rcu() dereference ->next directly
using ACCESS_ONCE() and then use list_entry_rcu() on it like other
rculist accessors.

v2: Paul pointed out that the compiler may fetch the pointer more than
    once nullifying the condition check.  ACCESS_ONCE() added on
    ->next dereference.

v3: Restored () around macro param which was accidentally removed.
    Spotted by Paul.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: default avatarFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 38a08644
......@@ -254,8 +254,9 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
*/
#define list_first_or_null_rcu(ptr, type, member) \
({struct list_head *__ptr = (ptr); \
struct list_head __rcu *__next = list_next_rcu(__ptr); \
likely(__ptr != __next) ? container_of(__next, type, member) : NULL; \
struct list_head *__next = ACCESS_ONCE(__ptr->next); \
likely(__ptr != __next) ? \
list_entry_rcu(__next, type, member) : NULL; \
})
/**
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment